Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Memorandum:
The contract for the proprietary operation by plaintiff of defendants' restaurant, including the use of defendants' liquor license, was against public policy (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, §§ 2, 64, subd 4; §§ 100, 111), and hence was void (see Schley v Andrews, 225 N.Y. 110; Duval v Wellman, 124 N.Y. 156; 15 Williston, Contracts [3d ed], § 1763). Special Term erred...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.