NORTHINGTON v. DAVIS

Docket No. L.A. 30731.

23 Cal.3d 955 (1979)

593 P.2d 221

154 Cal. Rptr. 524

SUSAN NORTHINGTON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. EDWARD DAVIS, as Chief of Police, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California.

April 3, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Burt Pines, City Attorney, Claude E. Hilker and Jerome Montgomery, Assistant City Attorneys, and Gregory C. O'Brien, Jr., Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Daniel M. Luevano, Robert T. Olmos, Patricia Tenoso, John E. McDermott, Michele Washington, Richard Rothschild, Rosalyn M. Chapman, Diane Messer and Linda Ferguson for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Antonio Rossmann, Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., Brent N. Rushforth and John R. Phillips as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

This case, like Woodland Hills Residents Assn., Inc. v. City Council, ante, page 917 [154 Cal.Rptr. 503, 593 P.2d 200], presents a question as to the propriety of an attorney fee award in public interest litigation. In this case, as in Woodland Hills, at the time the trial court passed on plaintiffs' motion for attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases