STRUSINER v. PERLIN

No. 79 C 963.

478 F.Supp. 464 (1979)

Paul C. STRUSINER, Plaintiff, v. Paul J. PERLIN, Philip Bloom and the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a Body Politic and Corporate, of the State of Illinois, John Doe, Richard Roe and Others Whose Identities are Presently Unknown, Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

October 17, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Phelan, Camillo F. Volini, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

John T. Coleman, Baker & McKenzie, Philip F. Johnson and John H. Stassen, Kirkland & Ellis, Clive D. Kamins, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court on the motion of the defendant Board of Trade of the City of Chicago (CBOT) to dismiss Counts IX, X and XI of the plaintiff's first amended complaint. Also before the court is the motion of defendant Paul J. Perlin to dismiss Counts I, II, III, VII, VIII and XII of the same complaint. Both motions were brought pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases