Judgment affirmed.
Defendant testified on direct examination, through an official interpreter, that he owned a gun at the time of the occurrence but that he did not have the weapon in his car and did not fire it on the night of the alleged shooting. On cross-examination he denied ownership of a gun. There was no redirect examination. Defendant's contention that his "admission" of ownership of a gun was an error in translation finds no support in the record. Further...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.