ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in making findings of fact and conclusions of law pertaining to arrearages he allegedly owed, and in conditioning the reduction of alimony upon defendant's payment of these arrearages. We agree.
G.S. 50-16.9(c) provides that a court of this state with personal jurisdiction over both parties may, upon a showing of changed circumstances, modify the alimony order of another jurisdiction. At the trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
