The proposed third cause of action does not allege an express, special contract to act solely as a finder, but rather seeks recovery on an implied promise, a theory this court heretofore rejected as insufficient to sustain a real estate broker's claim to recover a finder's fee. (Industrial & Commercial Realty Assoc. Co. v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
INDUS. & COMMERCIAL REALTY ASSOCS. CO. v. GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO., INC.
68 A.D.2d 853 (1979)
Industrial & Commercial Realty Associates Company, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 22, 1979
March 22, 1979
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
