SHULMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction on the offense of theft by receiving stolen property. We affirm.
1. Appellant maintains that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence unlawfully obtained.
On the issue of "standing," we agree with appellant's contentions. Since defendant was charged with an offense, "the essential element of which is possession" (Cook v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.