1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 611 F.2d
  5. 611 F.2d 296 (1979)
 

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC. v. GENERAL MILLS FUN GROUP

No. 77-2302.

611 F.2d 296 (1979)

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MILLS FUN GROUP et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 20, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Chickering (argued) of Warren Chickering & Grunewald, and John H. Denton, Oakland, Cal., for appellant Anti-Monopoly, Inc.

Robert S. Daggett (argued) of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., and Oliver P. Howes of Nims, Howes, Collison & Isner, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Anti-Monopoly, Inc. (Anti-Monopoly) appeals from a district court judgment declaring that the MONOPOLY trademark of Parker Brothers, an unincorporated division of General Mills Fun Group, Inc., is valid and enforceable, and that Anti-Monopoly's use of the name "Anti-Monopoly" as the title of its own game constitutes an infringement thereof. Anti-Monopoly also appeals from the district court's issuance of a permanent injunction which, among...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases