Judgment affirmed and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).
While we affirm the judgment of conviction due to the overwhelming proof of guilt, we observe that the prosecution should not have elicited from the two police witnesses that the defendant was the individual identified by the complaining witness (see People v Trowbridge,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.