1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 602 P.2d
  5. 602 P.2d 264 (1979)
 

STUPFEL v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.

Nos. CA 10711; SC 25992.

602 P.2d 264 (1979)

288 Or. 39

In the matter of the Compensation of Clair STUPFEL, Petitioner, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided November 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Caruso, of Welch, Bruun, Green & Caruso, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Marshall C. Cheney, of Cheney & Kelley, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Steven C. Yates and Evohl F. Malagon, Eugene, filed a brief amicus curiae for The Oregon Trial Lawyers Ass'n.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and HOLMAN, HOWELL, LENT and LINDE, JJ.

LENT, Justice.

This is an occupational disease claim filed in April, 1976. The employer denied the claim, and claimant's requested hearing was held in October, 1976. The referee issued his opinion and order in January, 1977, finding the claim to be compensable. The employer sought review by the Workers' Compensation Board, which affirmed the referee in August, 1977. The employer appealed and the circuit court affirmed in April, 1978.1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases