Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Appellant contends that her placement with the Division for Youth, Title III, following a dispositional hearing, was not supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act, § 745) and that the hearing court failed to consider less coercive placement alternatives. The findings of delinquency resulted from the admission by the appellant that she had committed acts which would have constituted robbery...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.