Per Curiam.
Relator argues that the trial court had no power to grant the alimony pendente lite because the request for such alimony was not in conformity with Civ. R. 75(M)(1) which requires that such request be contained "* * * in the complaint, answer, or counterclaim, or by motion served with the pleading * * *." The request in this case was contained in a counterclaim which was voluntarily dismissed, but the request for alimony was renewed by
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.