1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 259 S.E.2d
  5. 259 S.E.2d 572 (1979)
 

STATE v. ROGERS

No. 7914SC443.

259 S.E.2d 572 (1979)

43 N.C. App. 475

STATE of North Carolina v. Dorothy Hagwood ROGERS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by Asst. Atty. Gen. Isham B. Hudson, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

B. Frank Bullock, Durham, for defendant.

ROBERT M. MARTIN, Judge.

In her brief, defendant has failed to state the questions and pertinent assignments of error and exceptions at the beginning of each argument as required by Appellate Rule 28(b)(3) which provides: "Immediately following each question [presented in the brief] shall be a reference to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the question . . ." Appeals are subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the North Carolina Rules of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases