SHULMAN, Judge.
Appellant, who was found guilty of burglary, brings this appeal solely on the general grounds. Finding that the judgment is not subject to reversal for this reason, we affirm.
A review of the evidence, in the light most favorable to the prosecution, shows that an officer who responded to a call that a silent burglar alarm had been tripped at a commercial establishment positively identified appellant as the person he observed on the burglarized...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
