STATE v. BARFIELD

No. 12.

259 S.E.2d 510 (1979)

298 N.C. 306

STATE of North Carolina v. Margie Bullard BARFIELD.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 6, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard L. Griffin, Raleigh, for the state.

Robert D. Jacobson, Lumberton, for defendant-appellant.


BRITT, Justice.

We find no prejudicial error in either phase of defendant's trial and conclude that the verdicts and judgment should not be disturbed. We will discuss the errors assigned under each phase.

PHASE I—GUILT DETERMINATION

By her first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for the appointment of additional counsel. There is no merit in this assignment.

When it had been determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases