Upon this appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her pretrial motion to suppress identification testimony of witnesses who participated in a photographic identification procedure. The record establishes that the police, while laudably exhibiting some 11 photographs of 10 different, but similar individuals to the eyewitnesses, included in each showing two pictures of the defendant. Such a suggestive procedure cannot be condoned and respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
