1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 170 N.J.
  5. 170 N.J. Super. 593 (1979)
 

SCHOTT v. HARTMANN

170 N.J. Super. 593 (1979)

407 A.2d 1233

KENNETH SCHOTT, PLAINTIFF, v. NEIL HARTMANN, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, AND FRITZ DIETL AND CAROLA DIETL, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND OTTERSTEDT AGENCY AND THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, A CRUM & FORSTER INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 22, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph A. Pojanowski, III argued the cause for appellant Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (Messrs. Davies, Davies, Pojanowski, Meenan & Sandberg, attorneys).

No brief was submitted on behalf of respondent Neil Hartmann.

Before Judges SEIDMAN, MICHELS and DEVINE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, J.A.D.

By leave granted, third-party defendant Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) appeals from an order of the Law Division denying its motion to vacate the service of process and to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that it, as a national bank, may not be sued in New Jersey by virtue of the general provisions of the National Bank Act. Rev. Stat. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases