Initially, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's verdict, arguing that the People failed to carry their burden of proof on the issues of whether defendant entered the premises with the intent to commit a crime and whether his entry was unlawful (see Penal Law, § 140.25). There was testimony, however, that defendant and a codefendant entered the premises through the front door, which had been forced open, and that defendant remained...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
