HARRY C. MARTIN, Judge.
Defendants' counsel concede in their brief and oral argument that the trial court expressly stated the order here appealed did not prohibit plaintiff from further proper discovery, without limitation.
The order of Judge Rousseau did not affect a substantial right of the plaintiff. The appeal is interlocutory, fragmentary and premature and should be dismissed. Stanback v. Stanback,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.