MATURO v. SCRANTON


177 Conn. 569 (1979)

FERDINAND G. MATURO v. CHARLES H. SCRANTON ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released May 22, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Gallagher, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Frank J. Dumark, with whom, on the brief, was John E. Donegan, for the appellees (defendants Anthony M. Limoncelli et al.).

Kenneth M. Jacks, for the appellee (named defendant).

COTTER, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and PETERS, JS.


PER CURIAM.

This case concerns the sufficiency under the Statute of Frauds of a written contract for the sale of real property with an open-ended mortgage contingency clause. The plaintiff, Ferdinand G. Maturo, brought an action to compel specific performance and to recover monetary damages for breach of a contract to convey certain real estate. He sued the defendant Charles H. Scranton, the original seller, and, by amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases