Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements.
Pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, appellants served a demand for arbitration concerning the denial of salary and benefits "in violation of Article Seventeen D." The petitioner moved to stay arbitration on the ground that the parties had not agreed to arbitrate such a dispute. Its position was that article 17D states that in the event of a layoff "applicable provisions of law will...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
