LEE v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 1993.

121 Ariz. 589 (1979)

592 P.2d 785

Kurt C. LEE, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Associated Grocers, Respondent Employer, Associated Grocers c/o Fred S. James Co., Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

March 6, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Richard E. Taylor by Richard E. Taylor, Phoenix, for petitioner.

John H. Budd, Jr., Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for respondent The Industrial Commission of Ariz.

Shimmel, Hill, Bishop & Gruender, P.C. by J. Russell Skelton, Phoenix, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.


OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The questions urged on this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission's hearing officer in a workmen's compensation proceeding have arisen because the injured workman sought and received unauthorized treatment from a physician other than the physician designated by the employer pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1070.

Petitioner's employer, Associated Grocers, was self-insured and had complied with the requirements of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases