1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 603 F.2d
  5. 603 F.2d 100 (1979)
 

UNITED STATES v. STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA

No. 77-2144.

603 F.2d 100 (1979)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 27, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noble K. Gregory, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Barry Grossman, Robert J. Wiggers, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, District Judge.

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Standard Oil Company of California ("SOCAL") filed a Rule 60 motion to set aside an antitrust judgment against it for claimed fraud on the court. SOCAL lost the motion, and the district court imposed $88,253.52 attorney's fees and costs upon SOCAL on the ground that SOCAL had filed the motion "vexatiously and for oppressive reasons." The district court did not find any bad faith on the part of SOCAL in filing or prosecuting the motion, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases