RURAL/METRO FIRE DEPT., INC. v. PIMA CTY.

No. 2 CA-CIV 3140.

122 Ariz. 554 (1979)

596 P.2d 389

RURAL/METRO FIRE DEPT., INC., an Arizona Corporation, Rural Fire Dept., Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Stephen Kern, an Individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PIMA COUNTY, a Body Politic and Political Subdivision of the State of Arizona, Flowing Wells Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., a Purported Arizona Corporation, and Flowing Wells Volunteer Fire District, a Purported Body Politic, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

June 5, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Louis G. Jekel by Louis G. Jekel, Scottsdale, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by John R. Neubauer, Tucson, for defendants-appellees Pima County and Flowing Wells Volunteer Fire Dist.

Newkirk & Beren, P.C. by Peter Beren, Tucson, for defendant-appellee Flowing Wells Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc.


OPINION

RICHMOND, Chief Judge.

The question on this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants is whether the annexation of certain property to a volunteer fire district had been completed at the time plaintiffs commenced an action attacking its validity.

The complaint filed May 4, 1978, alleges that plaintiff Kern is a qualified elector of the territory which was the subject of the annexation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases