MATTER OF RITTERSPORN v. SADOWSKI


48 N.Y.2d 618 (1979)

In the Matter of B. A. Rittersporn, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Anthony Sadowski et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Thomas Venturini, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided August 30, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Larkin and Alvin E. Heutchy for appellant.

Lloyd R. Targer for petitioners-respondents.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

We have examined appellant's challenges to the designating petition based on several specified grounds and find them to be without merit. In particular we reject his contention that the presumption of regularity which attaches to the acts of a commissioner of deeds as a public officer should be inapplicable as a matter of law to statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases