1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 407 A.2d
  5. 407 A.2d 259 (1979)
 

L. C. v. A. C. C.

407 A.2d 259 (1979)

L. C., Petitioner, v. A. C. C., Respondent. J. M. D., Petitioner, v. J. P. D., Respondent. N. T. I., Petitioner, v. M. D. I., Respondent.

Family Court of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided March 1, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bertram S. Halberstadt of Biggs & Battaglia, Wilmington, for petitioner, L. C.

Robert K. Pearce of Trzuskowski, Kipp, Agostini & Kelleher, Wilmington, for respondent, A. C. C.

H. Alfred Tarrant, Jr., of Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, for petitioner, J. M. D.

Charles K. Keil of Bayard, Brill & Handelman, Wilmington, for respondent, J. P. D.

Joseph W. Benson of Gallo & Benson, Wilmington, for petitioner, N. T. I.

Edward T. Ciconte of D'Angelo & Ciconte, Wilmington, for respondent, M. D. I.

Before JAMES, HORGAN and WAKEFIELD, JJ.

JAMES, Judge:

Separate divorce actions before three judges of this Court require an interpretation of 13 Del.C. § 1518(h), a recent amendment to the Delaware Divorce and Annulment Act, Chapter 15, Title 13. Following extensive briefing, three judges of the Court sat en banc to hear oral argument from the attorneys representing all parties to the above divorces. Section 1518(h) provides:

"In order to assist a party to achieve independent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases