FLINTKOTE COMPANY, GLENS FALLS DIVISION, Appellant,
v.
W. Michael BLUMENTHAL, Secretary of the Treasury, Robert E. Chasen, Commissioner of Customs, W. Richard Nystrom, District Director of Customs, Canada Cement Lafarge Limited, Citadel Cement Corporation, Northeast Cement Division, Lake Ontario Cement Limited, Rochester Portland Cement Corp., St. Lawrence Cement Company, Independent Cement Corporation, and Genstar Ltd., Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 9, 1979.
Decided March 19, 1979.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Andrew P. Vance, New York City (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City, James H. Lundquist, Michael A. Johnson and Thomas O'Neill, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Velta A. Melnbrencis, Asst. Branch Director, New York City (Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, D. C., Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Acting Branch Director, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellees Blumenthal, Chasen and Nystrom.
Thomas A. Rothwell, Jr., Washington, D. C. (Pope, Ballard & Loos, Washington, D. C.), for appellees St. Lawrence Cement Company and Independent Cement Corporation.
Shearman & Sterling, New York City (W. Foster Wollen, Donald L. Cuneo and David J. Mark, New York City, of counsel), for appellees Canada Cement Lafarge Limited and Northeast Cement Division of The Citadel Corporation.
Arter & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio (M. Neal Rains, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellees Lake Ontario Cement Limited and Rochester Portland Cement Corp.
Williams & King, Washington, D. C. (William K. Ince and Burton R. Thorman, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee Genstar Ltd.
Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
This expedited appeal from an order of the District Court for the Northern District of New York entered on February 16, 1979,1 raises questions of the power and propriety of a district court's granting an American manufacturer relief ancillary to the primary relief sought by it in an action in the Customs Court under 19 U.S.C. § 1516 protesting the failure of the Secretary of the Treasury to impose antidumping...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
