IN RE YARN PROCESSING PAT. VALIDITY LIT.

MDL No. 82.

472 F.Supp. 170 (1979)

In re YARN PROCESSING PATENT VALIDITY LITIGATION.

United States District Court, S. D. Florida.

As Amended April 20, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Armstrong, III and Hugh J. Turner, Jr., Smathers & Thompson, Miami, Fla., for Lex Tex, Ltd., Inc.

William K. West, Jr., Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., for Burlington Industries.

Dale H. Hoscheit, Schuyler, Birch, Swindler, McKie & Beckett, Washington, D.C., for Monsanto of North Carolina, Inc.

Wallace D. Newcomb, Philadelphia, Pa., for Collins & Aikman.

David Rabin, Greensboro, N.C., for Dow-Badische Co., National Spinning Co., Collins & Aikman and Glen Raven Mills, Inc.

David Klingsberg and David F. Ryan, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York City, for National Spinning Co., Dow-Badische Co. and Hoechst Fiber Industries.

Daniel A. Kavanaugh, Miami, Fla., for ARCT and Barmag.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING LEX TEX'S DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL

ATKINS, Chief Judge.

These cases were joined with several others that were transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.1 The current infringement actions were brought by Lex Tex following a ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that Lex Tex's patents have been misused and are thus unenforceable; In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases