IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM v. STATE


167 N.J. Super. 471 (1979)

401 A.2d 258

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, HILLTOP PRIVATE NURSING HOME, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leonard A. Coyle argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Robert H. Howland, on the brief).

Mr. David S. Lieberman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Harvey Z. Werblowsky, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges ALLCORN and SEIDMAN.


PER CURIAM.

Appellant questions the "validity of the State Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum," on the ground that "no proofs of any kind were submitted [by the State] to the court to sustain [its] validity." The contention is not well taken.

Where, as here, the validity of a grand jury subpoena duces tecum is challenged, the State need establish preliminarily merely (1) the existence of a grand jury investigation and (2) the nature and subject matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases