The excuse for inordinate delay in responding to the demand for the bill may be said to be plausible but barely adequate. No reason is given for not advancing that explanation at the time that it was discovered that compliance with the demand could not be made timely instead of waiting until actual preclusion had been ordered and the case assigned to a trial part. In these circumstances we have imposed the stated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
