1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 595 F.2d
  5. 595 F.2d 9 (1979)
 

BATA SHOE CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES

No. 646-71.

595 F.2d 9 (1979)

BATA SHOE CO., INC. v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

February 21, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter A. I. Wilson, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff; John T. Koehler, attorney of record. Hudson, Creyke, Koehler, Tacke & Bixler, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

John Charles Ranney, Washington, D.C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Barbara Allen Babcock, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

Before DAVIS, KASHIWA and BENNETT, Judges.

OPINION

DAVIS, Judge:

The Renegotiation Board determined that Bata Shoe Company ("Bata" or "Bata Shoe") had realized excessive profits of $800,000 for the year 1967. Plaintiff sought a de novo review of that determination in this court pursuant to the Renegotiation Act of 1951, 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 1211-1233 (1970) as amended (Supp.V, 1975). Trial Judge Bernhardt reviewed each of the statutory factors in 50 U.S.C. App. § 1213(e...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases