1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 95 Cal.App.3d
  5. 95 Cal.App.3d 506 (1979)
 

MINNICK v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Docket No. 42545.

95 Cal.App.3d 506 (1979)

157 Cal. Rptr. 260

WAYNE MINNICK et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

July 27, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Howard, Prim, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady & Pollak, Stuart R. Pollak, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Steven L. Mayer, Steven E. Schon, Fred H. Altshuler and Constance Henderson for Defendants and Appellants.

Thomas A. Seaton and Mark N. Aaronson as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Ronald Yank and Christopher D. Burdick for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

RATTIGAN, J.

The California Department of Corrections and Jero J. Enomoto, its director, appeal from a declaratory judgment which states that they have violated specified constitutional and statutory provisions "by discriminating by reason of sex and by reason of ethnic background in hiring and promotion of employees" in the department. The judgment also orders, and the court issued, a "Permanent Injunction" restraining the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases