1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 259 S.E.2d
  5. 259 S.E.2d 338 (1979)
 

SCHOFIELD v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PAC. TEA CO.

No. 7910IC129.

259 S.E.2d 338 (1979)

43 N.C. App. 567

Paul B. SCHOFIELD v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., Self-Insurer.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caudle, Underwood & Kinsey by Lloyd C. Caudle and John H. Northey, III, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

R. A. Collier, Statesville, for plaintiff-appellee.

HILL, Judge.

The issues raised by the defendant appellant for our determination are:

1. Was the treatment received by the appellee of an emergency nature? 2. Was notice to and approval of the Commission and the defendant required prior to plaintiff's treatment by Dr. Klenner? 3. When an employer notifies an employee of its refusal to pay medical costs incurred after a certain date and continues to appeal award decisions covering liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases