BROOKS v. A. M. F., INC.

Nos. 48532, 48547 and 48631.

278 N.W.2d 310 (1979)

Myles BROOKS, Respondent, v. A. M. F., INC., et al., Respondents, Lynn Gieseke, d.b.a. St. Paul Seamless Surfacing Co., et al., Respondents, Child's Construction Company, et al., Respondents, Saxon Bowling Lanes, et al., Respondents, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, intervenor, Relator, Prudential Insurance Company, intervenor, Relator. and Elmer A. HENDRICKSON, Respondent, v. CENTRAL STATES INSULATION, INC., et al., Respondents, and General American Life Insurance Company, intervenor, Relator.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robins Davis & Lyons, Arnold M. Bellis and John G. Brian III, St. Paul, for Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota.

Van Evera, Mundt, Koskinen, Clure & Andrew and Thomas F. Andrew, Duluth, for Prudential Ins. Co.

Richards, Montgomery, Cobb & Bassford and John M. Degnan, Minneapolis, for General American Life Ins. Co.

Nilva & Frisch and Paul J. Gatto, St. Paul, for Brooks.

Cragg & Bailly and Gary J. Gordon, Minneapolis, for A. M. F., Inc.

Ronald O. W. Ylitalo, St. Paul, for Gieseke.

Johnson Goetteman Anderson & Laverdiere, Edina, for Child's Const. Co.

Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, St. Paul, for Saxon Bowling Lanes.

Oberg & Robbins, Wayzata, for Hendrickson.

Fitch & Johnson, Minneapolis, for Central States Insulation, Inc.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., Paul G. Zerby, Asst. Atty. Gen., P. Kenneth Kohnstamm, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Dept. of Public Welfare.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, KELLY, and YETKA, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

These consolidated certiorari appeals by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Prudential Insurance Company, and General American Life Insurance Company, health insurance intervenors, require our review of decisions by the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals denying intervenors' requests for reimbursement of medical expenses paid for employees who settled their workers' compensation claims without intervenors' agreement prior to trial on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases