HIGH SCHOOL DIST. NO. 106 v. CIVIL RTS. DIV.

2 CA-CIV 3057.

121 Ariz. 444 (1979)

590 P.2d 1390

HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 106, PIMA COUNTY, an Arizona School District, Petitioner-Appellee, v. CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, State of Arizona, Respondent-Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

February 14, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DeConcini, McDonald, Brammer, Yetwin & Lacy, P.C. by William B. Hanson and John C. Richardson, Tucson, for petitioner-appellee.

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Heather Sigworth and Philip G. Urry, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tucson, Arthur G. Garcia, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Executive Director of the Arizona Civil Rights Division Attorneys for respondent-intervenor-appellant.


OPINION

RICHMOND, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to intervene in a judicial proceeding to perpetuate testimony. 16 A.R.S. Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 27(a). An employer charged with discriminatory practices under the Civil Rights Act had petitioned to take the deposition of the complaining employee before any action had been commenced and the Arizona Civil Rights Division unsuccessfully sought intervention in order to oppose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases