1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 253 S.E.2d
  5. 253 S.E.2d 304 (1979)
 

LINDSEY v. THE CLINIC FOR WOMEN

No. 7716SC927.

253 S.E.2d 304 (1979)

40 N.C. App. 456

Barbara L. LINDSEY v. THE CLINIC FOR WOMEN, P. A., Dr. A. H. Westfall and Dr. Hugh McAllister, Individually.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 3, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daughtry, Hinton & Woodard by N. Leo Daughtry and W. Kenneth Hinton, Smithfield, for plaintiff appellee.

Anderson, Broadfoot & Anderson by H. W. Broadfoot, Fayetteville, for defendant appellants.

PARKER, Judge.

Defendants first assign error to the denial of their motion for a directed verdict made when plaintiff rested her case and renewed at the close of all of the evidence. Plaintiff contends that this assignment of error should be disregarded because defendants failed to state the grounds for their motion as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). That rule provides that "[a] motion for a directed verdict shall state the specific grounds therefor." We have held...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases