HARRY C. MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff argues the trial court erred in its charge by failing to instruct the jury concerning general and special benefits to defendants' property resulting from the highway project. We find no error.
Defendants' evidence tended to show the value of their remaining property was reduced by reason of the condemnation.
Plaintiff produced the following evidence indicating benefits to defendants' remaining property: the witness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
