MESSERSCHMITT-BOELKOW, ETC. v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT

No. 79 Civ. 3169 (LBS).

483 F.Supp. 49 (1979)

MESSERSCHMITT-BOELKOW-BLOHM GmbH, Plaintiff, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 15, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toren, McGeady & Stanger, P. C., New York City, David Toren, Leo Stanger, Gerald H. Kiel, New York City, for plaintiff.

Cole & Deitz, New York City, Anthony J. D'Auria, New York City, Latham, Watkins & Hills, Washington, D. C., Irwin Goldbloom, Robert K. Burgess, David K. Keyser, Washington, D. C., for defendant.


OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

Plaintiff Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm ("MBB") seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that two patents related to satellite technology, one owned by and the other licensed to defendant Hughes Aircraft Company ("Hughes"), are invalid. The complaint also seeks relief under the antitrust laws for, inter alia, monopolization or attempted monopolization by Hughes, with respect to these patents. Defendant has moved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases