1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 256 S.E.2d
  5. 256 S.E.2d 275 (1979)
 

STATE v. DeGINA

No. 7921SC278.

256 S.E.2d 275 (1979)

42 N.C. App. 156

STATE of North Carolina v. William Patrick DeGINA.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 3, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Isham B. Hudson, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Charles O. Peed, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.

ERWIN, Judge.

The initial question raised by defendant is whether the presumption in our State that one who is found in the possession of a forged instrument and is endeavoring to obtain money or advances upon it either forged or consented to the forging of the instrument, violates due process of law. We hold that it does not.

The presumption, or more properly labeled the inference, questioned by defendant was thoroughly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases