1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 250 S.E.2d
  5. 250 S.E.2d 276 (1979)
 

MURRAY v. MURRAY

No. 104.

250 S.E.2d 276 (1979)

296 N.C. 405

Mildred P. MURRAY v. Albert L. MURRAY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 4, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindsey, Schrimsher, Erwin, Bernhardt & Hewitt, P.A. by Lawrence W. Hewitt, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Henderson, Henderson & Shuford by David H. Henderson and David L. Henderson, Charlotte, for defendant.

COPELAND, Justice.

The sole question for our consideration is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff's motions for a directed verdict at the end of all the evidence and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. These motions can be considered together as they are controlled by the same standards and rules. Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E.2d 897 (1974). After reviewing the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases