RED. AUTH., WILKES-BARRE v. SERAFIN ET AL.

No. 229 C.D. 1978.

44 Pa.Commw. 463 (1979)

Redevelopment Authority of the City of Wilkes-Barre v. Stanley Serafin and Mary A. Serafin, his wife, Stanley Serafin Trucking, or any Other Person or Persons Found To Have an Interest in the Property. Stanley Serafin and Mary A. Serafin, his wife, Stanley Serafin Trucking, Appellants.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

July 27, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Peter Kanjorski, with him Paul E. Kanjorski, and Kanjorski & Kanjorski, for appellants.

Hugh F. Mundy, Donald D. McFadden, and Flanagan, Doran, Biscontini & Shaffer, for appellee.

Argued April 2, 1979, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., MENCER and ROGERS, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, July 27, 1979:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County making absolute a rule on the appellants, Stanley and Mary Serafin and Serafin Trucking, to show cause why a writ of possession should not issue. The rule was issued pursuant to Section 407(a) of the Eminent Domain Code (Code), Act of June 22, 1964, Special Sess., P.L. 84, as amended, 26 P.S. § 1-407(a).

The Redevelopment Authority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases