Supreme Court of Connecticut.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 14, 1979.
Decision released December 11, 1979.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
E. Eugene Spear, public defender, with whom, on the brief, were Jerrold H. Barnett, public defender, and Robert Gorman and Thomas Ullman, law student interns, for the appellant (defendant).
Eugene J. Callahan, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Donald A. Browne, state's attorney, and Frank S. Maco and Walter D. Flanagan, assistant state's attorneys, for the appellee (state).
COTTER, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, HEALEY and PARSKEY, JS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
PER CURIAM.
In State v. Branham,171 Conn. 12, 368 A.2d 63 (1976), we held that in the absence of controlling statutory provisions1 an accused is not entitled to an instruction to the jury that no adverse inferences are to be drawn from his failure to testify in his own defense. The defendant in this case asks us to reexamine and overrule Branham...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.