1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 496 F.Supp.
  5. 496 F.Supp. 9 (1979)
 

IN RE SUNSHINE MINING CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION

No. 77 Civ. 4020.

496 F.Supp. 9 (1979)

In re SUNSHINE MINING COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 25, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones, New York City, for plaintiff Maris; Donald N. Ruby, Michael P. Fuchs, New York City, of counsel.

Abraham I. Markowitz, New York City, for plaintiff Berenson.

Spengler, Carlson, Guber, Churchill & Brodsky, New York City, for defendant; Edward Brodsky, William J. McSherry, Jr., Robert D. Marafioti, New York City, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

In this multidistrict litigation, the defendants in two cases, Maris v. Sunshine Mining, and Stolz v. Sunshine Mining Company move for summary judgment on the ground that no federal question is presented, and accordingly there is no pendent jurisdictional basis for the state claims asserted. For reasons that follow that motion is granted.

Plaintiffs allege that as stockholders of Sunshine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases