1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 401 A.2d
  5. 401 A.2d 101 (1979)
 

CHESAPEAKE UTIL. v. CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TEL.

401 A.2d 101 (1979)

CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. TEAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Third-Party Defendants.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided March 30, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Poole and Somers S. Price, Jr., of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for defendant and third-party plaintiff.

Edmund D. Lyons and Edward M. McNally of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, for third-party defendants.

O'HARA, Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on the motion of Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland ("Telephone") for summary judgment on its cross-claim against Teal Construction, Inc. ("Teal") and its third-party claim against Bituminous Casualty Corp. ("Bituminous"). Both claims are for indemnification pursuant to a contract between Telephone and Teal for certain construction work in Salisbury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases