1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 166 N.J.
  5. 166 N.J. Super. 335 (1979)
 

PIERCE v. ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

166 N.J. Super. 335 (1979)

399 A.2d 1023

GRACE PIERCE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Ruth Russell Gray argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Myron J. Bromberg argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Porzio & Bromberg, attorneys; Ms. Patricia A. Meyer on the brief).

Before Judges KOLE and MILMED.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLE, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, a physician employed in research by defendant pharmaceutical company, filed a complaint seeking damages resulting from the termination of her employment with defendant, even though such employment was pursuant to an "at-will" relationship. The trial judge granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on the ground that even if plaintiff were constructively discharged and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases