1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 252 S.E.2d
  5. 252 S.E.2d 237 (1979)
 

ROBERSON v. ROBERSON

No. 789DC281.

252 S.E.2d 237 (1979)

40 N.C. App. 193

Dorothy N. ROBERSON v. Willard ROBERSON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hight, Faulkner & Hight by Henry W. Hight, Jr., Henderson, for plaintiff-appellee.

Kermit W. Ellis, Jr., Henderson, for defendant-appellant.

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

It is a well-established principle of trial practice that control over the arguments of counsel is largely within the discretion of the presiding judge. See Rupert v. Rupert, 15 N.C. App. 730, 190 S.E.2d 693 (1972), cert. denied, 282 N.C. 153, 191 S.E.2d 759 (1972). Indeed, the power of the trial judge to maintain absolute control...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases