SHOEMAKER v. CITY OF MUSCATINE

No. 61157.

275 N.W.2d 206 (1979)

Robert E. SHOEMAKER and Dorothy D. Shoemaker, Appellants, v. CITY OF MUSCATINE, Appellee, Stanley Consultants, Inc., Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

February 21, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Stevens, of Lewis & Stevens, Muscatine, for appellants.

Patrick M. Ryan, of Eckhardt, Goedken, Hintermeister & Ryan, Muscatine, for appellee.

Considered by REYNOLDSON, C. J., and LeGRAND, UHLENHOPP, HARRIS and ALLBEE, JJ.


ALLBEE, Justice.

This appeal was taken by plaintiffs, Robert and Dorothy Shoemaker, from a ruling which sustained a motion by defendant, City of Muscatine, to dismiss division IV of plaintiffs' petition. Because that ruling was interlocutory and plaintiffs failed to seek and obtain permission to appeal in advance of final judgment, this appeal must be dismissed.

Plaintiffs' property was condemned as part of Muscatine Urban Renewal Project 2. The compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases