HAMMARLEY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 17950.

89 Cal.App.3d 388 (1979)

153 Cal. Rptr. 608

JOHN HAMMARLEY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; ALFRED RICHARD SOSA et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 16, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan, William B. Shubb, John V. Diepenbrock and Charity Kenyon for Petitioner.

Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg & Roger, Victor Van Bourg, William B. Sokol, Roland E. Blubaugh, Daniel I. O'Neill, Wilson & Wong, Geoffrey P. Wong, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore B. Olson, Rosenthal & Leff and Irwin Leff as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Kenneth M. Wells, Public Defender, Kathryn K. Mader, Ernest F. Winters and Michael Anthony Delia, in pro. per., for Real Parties in Interest.


OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of review to annul a contempt judgment for refusing an order of respondent court to comply with a subpoena duces tecum. The threshold issue presented by this proceeding is the scope of protection accorded by Evidence Code section 1070 to information acquired by a newsman in the course of his professional activities which has not been disseminated to the public. (Hereinafter all statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases