STATE v. PETERSEN

No. 2 CA-CR 1812.

124 Ariz. 336 (1979)

604 P.2d 267

The STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Richard Kenneth PETERSEN and Gary Dean Rogers, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

December 4, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty., by Michael D. Alfred, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, for appellant.

Law Offices of Robert C. Rowland, P.C., by Jeffrey A. Marks, Tucson, for appellee Petersen.

Richard S. Oseran, Pima County Public Defender, by Allen G. Minker, Asst. Public Defender, Tucson, for appellee Rogers.


OPINION

RICHMOND, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from an order granting defendant Rogers's motion to suppress physical evidence and statements. It contends the court erred in its findings that Pima County Sheriff's officers lacked probable cause to arrest the defendants and that the state had not met its burden of showing that Rogers voluntarily consented to a search of his car. We affirm.

The power tools that are the subject of the motion to suppress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases