STATE v. CLAY

No. 40.

256 S.E.2d 176 (1979)

297 N.C. 555

STATE of North Carolina v. Maude Mae CLAY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Angela R. Bryant, Graham, for defendant-appellee.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by James Wallace, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.


BRANCH, Justice.

The State contends that the Court of Appeals incorrectly decided that the trial judge erred in admitting defendant's inculpatory statement into evidence.

Pursuant to defendant's motion to suppress this statement, the trial judge correctly conducted a voir dire hearing. After hearing testimony from Officer Barrow and defendant, the trial judge, inter alia, made the following findings of fact:

[That] [a]gain at approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases